Deeper - Evidence against Evolution

« Evidence against Evolution »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Sept 3, 2010, 2:25am

Go to the Deeper Homepage

Deeper :: Apologetics :: Apologetics :: Evidence against Evolution

Author

Topic: Evidence against Evolution (Read 1,622 times)

Will Williams
Administrator

member is offline

[msn]

Joined: Apr 2005
Gender: Male

Posts: 15
Location: Manchester, England
Karma: 1

Evidence against Evolution
« Thread Started on Jun 9, 2005, 6:05pm »

Evidence against Evolution

Evolutionists think that we evolved for apes. And they proudly use the fact that Human and chimp DNA is around 97% the same. Well here is a great anology that shows that even though things can be 97% simular, they can be totally opposite.
* There are many scientists today who question the evolutionary paradigm and its atheistic philosophical implications.
* There are not many scientists today who quesion the evolutionary paradigm and its atheistic philosophical implications.

These sentences have 97% homology and yet have opposite meanings. There is a strong ana.logy here to the what in which large DNA sequences can be turned on or off by relatively samll control sequences.

For those of you that believe in Punctuated Equilibrium then here is something for you. For those of you who do not know what Punctuated Equilibrium is here is what it is. Punctuated Equilibrium believes in evolution, but not through the time period of millions of years. Instead of it taking millions, or billions of years it happens when something gives birth. Evolutionists made this 'theory' up because of the lack of the missing link that darwinism needs. Punctuated Equilibrium takes away the need for a fossil record, yet has many flaws of it's own. We also don't see this occuring now.

The Law of Entropy also states that order cannot arise from disorder. Evolution denies this law. Simple as that.

Biogenesis also states that life cannot come from non-living matter. Which evolution needs to hold up its end of the story. Evolution says that unicellular organisms came from non-living matter such as gasses and other atoms/molecules. Basic biology classes teach people this and it's an obvious fact. This has never happened. Why would it happen any other time?

Run a few numbers; all life supposedly began from a primordial soup of amino acids plus an external power source, as lightning; there are twenty-one (I believe) amino acids identified.

That means that there are 21! (!=factorial, not enthusitic) different possible combinations of amino acids. That is 5.1090942 X 1019 possible combinations. Since there are left-handed and right-handed varieties of each, that makes 42! combinations. Now consider that right-handed amino acids are toxic to us left-handed organisms; how many works of literature would an infinite number of monkeys turn out if every other key on the typewriter were fatal to the monkey?

Next argument: take an ordinary sugar cube; crush it; wait to see how long it takes to re-form into a cube. Without the presence of intelligence acting upon things, the natural progression is from order to chaos, not the other way around.

The so-called fossil evidence for evolution is tragically flawed. Entire animals are extrapolated from a bit of skull, a tooth or two, a femur, etc., etc., etc. Many of the so-called evolutionary ancestors of humans have been downright frauds, as well. Observe humankind walking this planet today, and you will see more diversity than are described as "man's evolutionary tree". Lucy, a two and a half million year old three foot adult human? What about General Tom Thumb? He would have had to look up into "Lucy's" eyes! In the last ten years the man who held the claim as the world' tallest man died ... he was 8'4" tall. Goliath is described in the Bible as 6 cubits (approximately 18 inches per cubit) and a span (approximately 9 inches). That's 1'5" taller than the modern day 'giant'.

Ask an anthropologist about the age of a fossil, and they say it is so-and-so years old, because it is found in this geological setting. Ask a geologist about a rock stratum, and they say it is of this age, because these fossils are found in it. Neither one can explain why a fossilized plant (tree) is found vertically through 'millions of years' of sediment.

Move this planet 10% closer, or 10% further away from the sun, and life as we know it could not exist. (Water could not exist in all three states; not at all, if closer; only as ice, if further.) Tilt the axis of the earth to vertical to the plane of its orbit around the sun, and the mere homogenous nature of weather would preclude the need for any variety of life at all! Why would a bird molt two or more times a year, if the temperature were very nearly a constant? Tides are said to be a major contributor to many forms of life; without the moon, tides would be negligible, ergo many forms of life would not exist (or at least, there would be no advantage in their existence).

The evolutionary process has to be an incredibly lucky one! For asexual reproduction, the 'luck' aspect is greatly reduced, but for bisexual reproduction it is of paramount importance! One mutated organism of any species will not pass on its new characteristics to its offspring ... a mate must be involved. Lesser element of 'luck': the mutation is a dominant gene change. Greater element of 'luck': the mutation occurs more than once, and (fortuitously!) a male and female with the same mutation are located close enough 'for practical purposes'

As an extremely unlucky individual, I find it too far fetched to believe that:
Life developed from a chance combining of elements from a 'primordial soup'
Said life became more complex; monocellular to multicellular, etc.
asexual life became (largely) bisexual
multicellular life specialized into blood, bone, muscles, nerves, etc. as part of a new whole creature
said creatures diversified into mammal/reptile and further subdivided
canine
feline
arboreal (we descended from apes, right?)
etc.
nerves specialized into a brain capable of contemplating its own existence!

Hey, if I had .0000001% of that luck, my $1.00 purchase of a Megamillions ticket would turn me into a multimillionaire!

In the absence of an intelligence operating on material, the tendency is to proceed from order (sugar cube) to chaos (loose grains of sugar), not the other way around.

copyright © alive forums

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

Visits:

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free

This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Report Abuse | Mobile